Toward The Endless Frontierhistory Of The Committee On Science And Technology, 1959-79
From Million Book Space
Contents |
[edit] Title
![]()
Toward The Endless Frontierhistory Of The Committee On Science And Technology, 1959-79
[edit] Metadata
Barcode: 99999991596656
Bookno: 31040118
Creator: Hechler, Ken
Subject: United States Congress House Committee on Science and Technology United States Congress House Committee on Science and Technology
Date: 1980
Identifier: CHINA
Format: Text/html(.html,.htm)
Publisher: [[Publisher:[Washington, D.C.] ,U.S. House of Representatives ,For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off | [Washington, D.C.] ,U.S. House of Representatives ,For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off]]
Language: English
Scanning Centre: CHINA-NORTH
Totalpages: 0
Rights: IN_COPYRIGHT
[edit] Summarization
[edit] Navigation
[edit] Fulltext
[| View Book ]
[edit] Table of Content
- COVER
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- I. IN THE BEGINNING, THE SELECT COMMITTEE
- Accomplishments of the select committee
- What led to the creation of the select committee?
- Meanwhile at the White House
- The Johnson committee hearings and Vanguard
- Explorer I
- Establishment of the select committee
- Membership of the select committee (1958)
- The high hopes of Overton Brooks
- Future President joins select committee
- Hearings before the select committee
- Birth of the House Committee on Science and Astronautics
- Joint Committee or separate House and Senate Committees?
- Committee on Science and Astronautics officially sanctioned
- The writing of the Space Act and the establishment of NASA
- Patent policy
- The National Aeronautics and Space Council
- Annual authorizations for NASA
- Reports of the House select committee
- II. THE OVERTON BROOKS YEARS, 1959-61
- Overton Brooks as chairman
- Committee membership
- Recruitment of staff
- Getting the committee organised
- First meeting of the committee
- The first public hearing
- The Next Ten Years in Space, 1959-1969
- The committee jurisdiction
- Establishment of subcommittees
- NASA authorization in 1959
- Annual authorization
- Panel on science and technology
- The passing of the scepter
- III. RACING FOR THE MOON
- Keith Glennan
- The space race
- Executive privilege
- Transfer of the von Braun team to NASA
- Life sciences
- Project Mercury
- A new Administrator for NASA
- The Air Force challenge to NASA
- Manned flight and the Kennedy budget
- Effect of Gagarin flight
- Reaction of President Kennedy
- The committee seizes the initiative
- Speeding up the lunar landing timetable
- Shepard s suborbital flight
- The committee and the lunar landing goal
- IV. THE EARLY MILLER YEARS
- Contrasts between Brooks and Miller
- Relations with NASA
- Membership and subcommittee organization
- Jurisdiction
- Staff operation
- Delegation to subcommittees
- Additional assistance
- The committee and the Mercury program
- The committee and Nova
- Protecting launch operations
- Karth and space science
- Construction of facilities
- Patents and inventions
- Other areas of activity
- The end of the honeymoon
- V. SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1963-69
- Why the Daddario subcommittee was formed
- Formation of the Elliott committee
- Daddario background
- Philip B. Yeager
- First hearings of Daddario subcommittee
- Research management advisory panel
- Science Policy Research Division
- Government and Science seminar
- National Science Foundation
- Geographic distribution
- Basic Research and National Goals
- The move to the Rayburn Building
- Three-year review of the National Science Foundation
- Research in social sciences
- Vice President Humphrey s visit
- Standard reference data legislation
- Fire research and safety
- Applied science and technological progress
- Institutional grants for science education
- Pollution abatement
- Environmental quality
- International science
- International biological program
- Other international activities
- Management of Federal scientific activities
- Technology assessment
- Assessment of the Daddario subcommittee, 1963-69
- VI. GEMINI AND APOLLO
- Briefing Congress on the space program
- Personnel of Manned Space Flight Subcommittee
- 1963: The first year of strong opposition
- Joint U.S.-U.S.S.R. expedition to the Moon?
- Visitor center at the Cape
- Manned space program comes of age
- Critical Issues Council
- Bipartisan support for manned space flight
- Minority staff
- Victories in 1965
- Geographic distribution of research contracts
- Passage of the NASA authorization bill in 1965
- Future planning
- Progress in 1966
- Fire in the Cockpit
- The committee investigation
- The Phillips report
- Effect of the Teague committee hearings
- A new Administrator; Dr. Thomas O. Paine
- VII. SPACE SCIENCE, APPLICATIONS, AND ADVANCED RESEARCH, 1963-69
- Weather satellites
- Communications satellites
- Electronics research center
- Ranger
- Lunar Orbiter and Surveyor
- Mariner, Mars, and Venus
- Earth resources technology satellites
- Sustaining university program
- Applications technology satellites
- Other projects in space science and applications
- Solids versus liquids
- Subcommittee membership
- Aeronautics
- Nerva and nuclear power
- Unidentified flying objects
- Tracking and data acquisition
- For the benefit of all mankind
- VIII. DECISION ON THE SPACE SHUTTLE
- Should we land on Mars?
- Space Task Group recommendations
- Committee reaction to the Space Shuttle
- Committee hearings on the Space Shuttle
- Subcommittee markup of NASA authorization in 1970
- Karth blasts Shuttle
- Full committee and NASA authorization in 1970
- The split among committee Republicans
- The Shuttle fight in the House
- Karth amendment against Shuttle
- Fulton s recommit motion
- Where do we go from here?
- Committee leadership on future of space
- Teague accentuates the positive
- Winning Karth s support for the Shuttle
- Floor debate on NASA authorization in 1971
- The committee and the 1972 Shuttle decision
- Committee reaction to the decision
- The Presidential campaign of 1972
- Bella, it is nice to have you with us
- Committee support in 1972 debate
- The committee and Shuttle contracts
- A new chairman for Manned Space Flight Subcommittee
- Oversight on the Shuttle program
- The opposition in 1973
- The main engine problems in 1974
- The Shuttle and the automobile
- Austerity hits the Shuttle
- The Air Force and the Shuttle
- The fifth Space Shuttle Obiter
- The Shuttle in perspective
- Supplemental for Shuttle
- Additional funds required
- IX. SPACE SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS IN THE 1970 s
- Apollo applications becomes Skylab
- Renewed support for Skylab
- 1973: The year of Skylab
- Scientific exploration of the Moon
- The committee and Apollo in 1971-72
- Apollo 17 and Chairman Miller s retirement
- Teague succeeds Miller
- The four chairmen of Space Science and Applica-tions
- Earth Resources Information System
- Future space programs
- Tracking and data acquisition
- Technology utilization
- Public affairs program
- X. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION, 1959-79
- Peaceful exploration of outer space-1958
- Chairman Brooks and international cooperation
- Science committee leadership on international policy
- Fulton pushes cooperation
- International agreements and the tracking network
- Anfuso advocates more cooperation
- The U-2 fiasco
- A committee divided
- International science activities and the NSF
- Chairman Miller and international cooperation
- Radio astronomy, communications, and weather satellites
- International satellites
- Cooperation with the Soviet Union
- A new tug-of-war over cooperation
- The Outer Space Treaty of 1967
- Competition versus cooperation
- Influence of the Panel on Science and Technology
- Improving management of international sciences
- Applied science and world economy
- International visits
- Survey of international sciences
- Chairman Miller and the Council of Europe
- Confrontation meeting with the OECD
- U.N. Conference in Vienna
- Scientific cooperation with Canada
- Visit of Canadian Senators
- The political risks of international issues
- American flag on the Moon—1969
- Establishment of the international subcommittee
- Oversight subcommittee and international affairs—1970
- Farnborough and Paris Air Shows
- Background of international subcommittee
- Status of international cooperation—1971
- The challenge of youth
- International Science Foundation
- Chairman Miller and international science—1971
- High noon for the environment
- Meeting of the ministers of science, OECD
- A new chairman: Jim Symington—1972
- The Lausanne Conference—1972
- Cooperative agreements with the Soviet Union—1972
- Richard T. Hanna—1973-74
- U.S.-U.S.S.R. advanced technology transfer
- Technology transfer to underdeveloped nations
- Brussels conference on satellite transmissions
- Apollo-Soyuz
- Keeping the committee members informed
- Progress of negotiations—1972
- Opposition to Apollo-Soyuz
- The Teague-Winn trip to Russia—1972
- Teague opposition to Apollo-Soyuz
- Astronaut Stafford moderates Teague s opposition
- Stabilizing factors
- Safety and money limitations
- Teague presses for more experiments
- More money for experiments
- Apollo-Soyuz a success—1975
- DISPA—1975-76
- Ray Thornton as chairman
- International implications of early hearings—1975
- Impact of Thornton subcommittee recommendations
- Technology transfer to OPEC countries
- U.S.-U.S.S.R. cooperative agreements—1975
- Council of Europe Conference in 1975
- DISPAC—1977-78, Chairman Scheuer
- Jurisdictional problems
- Law of the Sea Conference
- Comparative criminal justice
- Nutrition
- Appropriate technology
- Science, Technology, and Diplomacy Act of 1978
- Transfer of technology to OPEC countries
- U.S.-U.S.S.R. cooperative agreements—1978
- U.N. Conference on Science and Technology
- Other DISP AC activities
- European oversight trip
- The Wydler reports
- Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
- International space activities
- Institute for Scientific and Technological Cooperation
- United States-China scientific exchanges
- European oversight trip in 1979
- Conclusion
- XI. INCHING TOWARD THE METRIC SYSTEM, 1959-79
- Endorsement of metric system by panel—1961
- Committee members take sides
- H. R. Gross opposes metric—1962
- Chairman Miller leads the fight—1965
- Wydler cool toward metric
- Judge Smith and the little red schoolhouse
- Senator Pell leads Senate fight—1966
- Science Committee effort
- Wydler asks House to defer action
- The House finally debates metric—1968
- Chairman Miller as floor leader
- Terms of the 1968 metric study law
- Committee briefed on study report
- Is metrication in the dictionary?
- Small business opposition
- Representative John W. Davis and the metric bill
- Labor insists on tool subsidy
- Marking up the metric bill—1973
- Labor sways the Rules Committee
- Labor and rightwing opposition to metric system
- Labor and small business gang up
- Defeat in 1974
- The Metric Conversion Act of 1975
- Lloyd plugs for labor bill
- Symington subcommittee markup
- Emery fights for 10-year goal
- Labor pressures renewed
- Smooth sailing for the metric bill
- Symington summarizes policy decisions
- Goldwater and Emery deplore lack of target date
- Accepting the Senate metric bill
- President Carter s policy statement on metric
- A rose by any other name
- The Highway Administration gaffe
- From Fahrenheit to Celsius
- The committee steps into the breach
- The pluses and minuses of 1977
- Metric Board finally gets underway—1978
- GAO report raises doubts
- Teague spells out intent of Congress
- Support for metric system in 1979
- Opposition in 1979
- XII. SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 1970-79
- Will applied research dilute basic research?
- NSF funding in 1970
- Subcommittee in 1971
- The OMB and applied research
- Research applied to national needs—RANN
- Subcommittee decisions in 1971
- Impoundment of NSF funds in 1971
- A new director for NSF in 1972
- Counterattack against impoundment
- The subcommittee in 1973
- Funding the NSF in 1973
- Impoundment battle in the House
- NSF and the abortion issue
- Improving oversight over NSF
- Talking with the OMB
- The NSF in 1974
- Geographic distribution of NSF funds
- Symington becomes subcommittee chairman
- NSF education progress in 1975
- Conlan attacks MACOS
- Geographic distribution in 1975
- Conlan s strategy
- Teague and MACOS
- MACOS debated in full committee meeting
- The floor fight over MACOS in 1975
- House narrowly defeats Conlan amendment
- Peer review
- The Moudy report on MACOS
- Conlan and the ISIS program
- GAO report on ISIS
- 1976 NSF authorization
- Silly-sounding NSF projects
- Science for citizens program
- The controversy escalates
- Who will blink first?
- Thornton becomes subcommittee chairman in 1977
- Organization meeting of the Thornton subcommittee
- The science for citizens program in 1977
- Flowers renews fight for wider distribution
- Floor debate on NSF authorization in 1977
- NSF authorization hearings in 1978
- Flowers makes last plea for geographic distribution
- Floor debate on NSF authorization in 1978
- Are those NSF grants really so silly?
- The rationale for basic research
- The subcommittee in 1979
- The NSF in 1979
- Growth in research funding
- The need for basic research
- Crazy-sounding grants
- Department of Education and NSF education programs
- Basic charter of the National Science Foundation
- Office of Technology Assessment, 1970-79
- Los Angeles-San Francisco hearings
- Symington and the Missouri hearings
- A rider to the Legislative Reorganization Act
- Penetrating questions by Wydler
- Unanimous committee support for OTA bill
- Hurry, hurry!
- Interest in technology assessment mounts
- Surprise
- Preparing for the floor debate
- The Henderson and Brooks amendments
- OTA bill passes with Brooks amendments
- President signs OTA Act
- Growing pains and personality problems
- Other OTA problems involve the subcommittee
- The Teague report
- Conclusions on OTA
- Fire research and development
- Low priority treatment
- Congressman Steele carries the ball
- Miller throws a block
- America Burning
- Expanded fire safety legislation passed in 1974
- Doubling the authorization
- Flippo and Hollenbeck urge aggressive action
- Authorization for fire prevention in 1979
- Standard Reference Data System
- Practical applications
- Oversight of National Bureau of Standards
- Voluntary standards
- Symington s Bureau of Standards bill
- NBS oversight hearings in 1977
- Materials policy research
- Materials policy handbook
- Earthquake research and engineering
- Victory in 1977
- DNA and genetic engineering
- Probing at the edges of knowledge
- Committee discussion in 1971
- The 1974 and 1976 committee studies
- Thornton hearings in 1977
- Considering new legislation on DNA
- George Brown and guayule
- The philosopher-politician
- Overcoming negative objections
- Successful joint markup session
- Seeking the formula for compromise
- Victory!
- Other subcommittee activities
- Employment of scientists and engineers
- Innovation and productivity
- Intergovernmental science policy
- Water resources and agriculture
- XIII. SCIENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE
- Bipartisan opposition to scuttling of science machinery
- Long-range approach of Science Committee
- A national science policy
- Basic research and NIRAS
- Dissemination of scientific information
- New technological opportunities
- Committee muffs its chance in 1972
- The reorganisation bombshell
- Full committee hearings
- Symington and Goldwater are critical
- Teague: What is happening and why?
- The low-key approach
- The congressional role in science policy
- The 1974 hearings
- Careful cooperation with the White House
- The Killian report
- Green light to draft a bill
- Timing the legislative initiative
- The deliberate strategy
- Interest of Ford as Vice President
- Teague and President Ford
- Yeager s approach
- Bad news and good news
- Rockefeller makes his report
- The first Teague-Mosher bill
- Nudging the White House toward action
- A dramatic spectacular
- Internal debate in the White House
- The prospects for legislation in 1975
- Dr. Stever leads off
- Drafting a new Teague-Mosher bill
- The July 30 revised bill
- Negotiations with the White House
- McCormack and Brown reservations
- Full committee markup meeting
- The House ratifies committee decisions
- Negotiating with three Senate committees
